There are no products in your shopping cart.
Some useful statements as quoted from Tom's hardware
"The most energy-efficient drives are those that run at low rotation speeds such as 4,200 RPM - or even 3,600 RPM for 1.8" hard drives."
"SATA drives generally require more power than UltraATA models."
"to the power consumption results: Samsung is slightly more efficient, while the WD drive requires slightly more power. The Travelstar 5K250 doesn't have any significant disadvantage either."

The following is an updated article from Tom's hardware available here that includes 250GB 2.5" SATA hard drives from Fujitsu, Hitachi, Samsung, Western Digital and Seagate, as well as the new generation 320GB 2.5" SATA hard drives from Samsung.

Another follow-up article by Tom's hardware available here updated with 320GB 2.5" SATA hard drives from Western Digital, Toshiba and Samsung.

X-bit labs has also published an article here that contains information regarding the power consumption of the latest 2.5" SATA hard drives.

Using information from both web site, we can conclude that, Hitachi's 5K250 uses the least amount of power in SATA 2.5" hard drive race at the moment.
For those considering to use SSD drive, we suggest you look at this article by AnandTech.
| Battery Life in Hours (Higher is Better) | MacBook Pro (Hitachi 5400RPM) | MacBook Pro (Memoright SSD) |
| Wireless Internet Browsing + MP3 Playback | 5.13 hours | 5.0 hours |
| DVD Playback | 3.88 hours | 3.58 hours |
| Heavy Downloading + XviD Playback + Web Browsing | 3.38 hours | 3.37 hours |
Test of Macbook air using the SSD drive DOES NOT gives you better battery life compared to Hitachi's 5k250. So the only realy advantage with SSD is the stock tolerance compared to mechanical hard disk. (That is if have thousands of spare money to waste on a SSD......)
Feel free to challenge our conclusion and discuss in our forum.